At 10offshorecasinos.cn.com, every casino rating is earned through documented, hands-on testing — never desk research alone. This page explains exactly how we assess the offshore casinos in our rankings, what each evaluation criterion involves, and why our approach produces results you can trust. No operator influences our scores, and no commercial relationship shapes our methodology.
Why Our Rating Process Matters
The offshore casino market lacks the mandatory oversight that the UK Gambling Commission applies to licensed operators. Without a regulator verifying operator claims, it falls to independent reviewers to separate the reliable platforms from the problematic ones. Most casino review sites rely on operator-supplied information, recycled content from other affiliates, or surface-level assessments that barely scratch beyond the homepage.
We take a fundamentally different approach. Every casino that appears in our rankings has been tested through real deposits, real withdrawals, real bonus claims, and real support interactions. Our team — James Whitfield and Sophie Aldridge — personally execute every step of the evaluation. The data we publish comes from our own accounts, our own money, and our own documented experience.
This methodology costs more time and money than aggregating information from press releases. But it produces reviews that reflect what you will actually experience as a player, not what the operator’s marketing department wants you to believe.
Our Rating Criteria
We assess every offshore casino across seven core categories. Each category carries equal weight in our overall evaluation. Below is a detailed explanation of what we test and what we look for in each area.
Licensing and Regulatory Standing
We begin every review by verifying the operator’s licence. For Curaçao-licensed casinos, this means checking the licence number against the Curaçao Gaming Control Board registry and confirming the licence is active and assigned to the stated operating entity. For MGA-licensed sites, we verify through the Malta Gaming Authority’s public register. We also check for any published enforcement actions, fines, or licence suspensions against the operator or its parent company.
Beyond the licence itself, we evaluate the regulatory jurisdiction’s standards. A Curaçao CGCB licence issued under the 2024 reform framework carries more weight than a legacy sub-licence, because the new regulations require stricter AML compliance, mandatory player complaint mechanisms, and segregated funds procedures. We note these distinctions in our reviews.
We also research the operating entity’s track record across other brands. An operator running multiple established casinos with clean compliance histories scores higher than a newly formed entity with no track record.
Deposit and Withdrawal Testing
This is the most resource-intensive part of our review process and the one we consider most valuable. We make real deposits using at least two different payment methods — typically one fiat option (Visa or e-wallet) and one cryptocurrency (Bitcoin or Tether). We record whether deposits land instantly and whether any unexpected fees are applied.
We then trigger withdrawals through every supported method and document the complete timeline: request submission, approval notification, and funds received. For crypto, we record blockchain confirmation times. For cards and e-wallets, we track business days from request to cleared funds in our account.
We also test KYC verification speed by submitting documents with our first withdrawal and recording how long approval takes. Any discrepancies between advertised and actual withdrawal speeds are flagged prominently in the review.
Minimum deposit and withdrawal thresholds, weekly or monthly cashout caps, and any fee structures are verified against the operator’s stated terms and reported accurately.
Bonus and Promotion Evaluation
We claim the welcome bonus at every site and track the full experience. This includes confirming whether the bonus activates correctly, verifying the stated wagering requirement matches the terms and conditions, and checking game contribution weights against what is advertised.
We pay particular attention to maximum bet limits during active bonus play, bonus expiry periods, and any hidden conditions that could result in forfeiture. If the operator’s promotional page claims 35x wagering but the full terms reveal that only slots contribute 100% while table games contribute 5%, we calculate the effective wagering requirement and report it.
For ongoing promotions — reload bonuses, cashback programmes, loyalty schemes, and tournaments — we evaluate whether they provide genuine recurring value or exist primarily as marketing decoration. We assess the transparency of VIP tier thresholds and whether published benefits match what players actually receive.
Game Library and Software Quality
We audit the game library for provider legitimacy, catalogue size, and genre diversity. We cross-reference listed providers against known licensing databases to ensure all software suppliers hold valid operator licences. We check whether stated game counts are accurate by manually browsing categories and filtering by provider.
Playability is tested across multiple game types — slots, live dealer, table games, and speciality titles. We check loading speeds, mobile compatibility, and whether games function without technical issues. For live casino sections, we assess stream quality, dealer professionalism, and table availability during peak and off-peak hours.
We also note whether the site offers game features that enhance the player experience, such as RTP display on thumbnails, demo play availability, favourites lists, and recently played sections.
Customer Support Assessment
We contact support through every available channel at different times of day, including late evening and weekend periods. For live chat, we record response times (initial and resolution) and assess agent knowledge by asking specific questions about bonus terms, withdrawal procedures, and responsible gambling options.
Email support is tested with detailed queries that require more than a template response. We measure reply speed and evaluate whether the answer actually addresses the question asked. We also note whether the site offers any form of callback or telephone support.
The quality of the self-help resources — FAQ sections, help centres, and terms documentation — is reviewed for completeness and accuracy. We check whether the information in help articles matches the actual platform behaviour we observed during testing.
User Experience and Mobile Performance
We evaluate the site’s interface on desktop (Windows and Mac) and mobile (iOS and Android) using current browser versions. Key metrics include page load speed, navigation logic, search and filter functionality, and overall visual design quality. We note any broken features, dead links, or usability issues encountered during our testing period.
Mobile experience receives particular attention because the majority of online gambling sessions now occur on phones. We test whether all account functions — registration, deposits, withdrawals, bonus claims, and support access — are fully available through the mobile browser interface.
If a dedicated app exists (Android APK or otherwise), we download and test it against the browser version to identify any functionality gaps.
Player Feedback and Reputation Research
Our direct testing provides first-hand data, but we supplement this with structured research into player feedback across independent forums, review aggregators, and community channels. We look for recurring patterns — both positive and negative — that align with or contradict our own findings.
We give greater weight to detailed, specific player reports over vague one-line reviews. Complaints about withheld withdrawals, bonus disputes, or unresponsive support are cross-referenced against our own experience. If a casino performs well in ou10offshorecasinos.cn.comr testing but carries a pattern of unresolved player complaints, this is reflected in the rating.
We also monitor licensing authority enforcement records, industry news, and operator communications for any developments that may affect the site’s standing between our regular review cycles.
How Scores Are Determined
Each of the seven categories above is assessed independently. We do not assign numerical scores publicly — instead, we present our findings transparently within each review section so you can evaluate the evidence yourself and decide what matters most to your own priorities.
Our overall ranking considers performance across all categories with no single criterion able to override the others. A casino with excellent withdrawal speeds but poor support quality will not rank above a casino that performs consistently well across every metric.
Rankings are updated quarterly, or sooner if material changes occur — such as licence revocations, major T&C alterations, or significant player complaint patterns emerging.
Our Commitment to Accuracy
Every data point published on 10offshorecasinos.cn.com comes from testing conducted within the preceding six months. If a review contains information older than this, it is flagged for re-testing. When operators make changes to their bonus terms, payment methods, or licensing status, we update the relevant content as quickly as possible.
We welcome player feedback that supports or challenges our findings. If your experience at a listed casino differs from what we have reported, we want to hear about it. Corrections and updates based on verified reader reports make our content stronger and more useful for everyone.
If you are concerned about your own gambling habits, confidential support is available through GamCare. You can also self-exclude from UKGC-licensed sites through GamStop.